Yes use a rubber band instead of a spring for your ois and call it innovative. Well at least its a start I dont understand how people say they copied apple when they all copy
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 19:19
- 010S
Apple hear my request
Change every thing of iPhone u want but don't change the size of Display . Display size of iPhone 4 & 4S is best forever
(Please)
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 18:39
- PUMX
I am fan of new tech but I see the only thing that Apple are very good at is to improve existing technology and try to patent it. Then they will say that they reinvented the way how people take pictures, lol.
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 13:52
- tt8F
> In reply to Protocol @ 2014-01-10 17:23 from t1$A - click to readthats like saying apple just added 64bit pc's have been doing that for years
the smart thing for companies to do is use ideas from the dedicated mainstream products to make their devices better.
or you could make the companies not release anythingh new unless it is entirely new in the technology world.
wait send those 1080p displays back sony, samsung lg etc etc
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 12:59
- 989$
> In reply to UCGILL @ 2014-01-10 22:41 from KIC0 - click to readDon't pay attention to them.He is a little child that doesn't even know what's the meaning of Technology and progress and he thinks that higher numbers are always better and Samsung can easily fool him.So if you explain a million times for him again he won't understand.
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 11:31
- HI8q
The fact that Apple has another patent does't mean that something will improve.
Apple is a patent troll.
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 08:07
- 0Bxh
I am fan of new tech but I see the only thing that Apple are very good at is to improve existing technology and try to patent it. Then they will say that they reinvented the way how people take pictures, lol.
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 05:40
- 6ChC
> In reply to geordie81 @ 2014-01-10 16:35 from H58d - click to readDid you miss the part, where extra pixels in mobiles are used for compensating for the fact that they dont have optical zoom?
Or for that matter any kind of cropping for landscape and city views. This is also true for DSLRs.
While perfect vision might only compare to about 14megapixels or so, the eye actually scans the area focusing in on different things, so you can precieve more details than resolution suggest.
In that way more pixels are great for taking pictures in which you later can study the same details that your eyes captured, without having to switch to a telephoto lens.
The problem would be noise and low ligt performance, trying to fit more pixels on to a small sensor. But pixels now sit closer and each pixel has become more capable of capturing light, so adding resolution has not meant much of a loss in terms of pixel and low light performance, rather the other way around.
But If you were to use the newest technology and scale up pixels, you could do better, and that is what canon did on their concept full HD sensor, that surpasses the eyes capability to capture light, several of times over, but on the other hand it loses out in details and we are yet to see any highly lit situations, my guess is that those sensors lack the ability to deal with both well lit situations and dark ones, so in that sense they are still like a night vision concept, but with more accurate colors.
If manufactors keeps pushing the limits, maybe one day soon, we will have sensors even for mobiles that ourtesolves the eye and captures more light so that you can be sure that with a single lens, you can get all the same details and more that your eyes would have ever seen... And that is what most photogrphers and consumers neeed, not the ability to telephoto zoom in on details they didnt even know was there in the first place.
ANd to do that, backing off in terms of resolution from where we are now is not really an option.
And pushing for more pixels in a sensor the size of the one in the 1020, would mean that using the same technology, they could produce smaller sensors with more pixels than today, without quality loss. The 1020 really has too big of a sensor for a general consumer phone (and not placing it above the display like apple and sony, was a misstake, a taller device would feel better in the hand, and as long as the display dont continue for the full lenght, it would not be any less userfriendly either).
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 05:11
- mhBf
> In reply to z @ 2014-01-10 16:02 from 7ILw - click to readThat simply isnt true anymore.
Those extra pixels are put to use today.
With optical zoom on board, and perfect ISO performance I would agree, most people dont need more than about 8-9 megapixels, as that is photquality paper sized prints.
And also then, it would have to capture that resolution, and due to the technology used in most sensor with a low pass filter, you actually need higher resolution to be able to achieve that.
But the way Nokia and to some extent Sony are working with pixels, you get benefits even for smaller prints. Or uploading to the web, thanks to zoom capabilities, smart HDR and supersampling.
So no, if you think 8mp is enough, they you are missing all those other aspects of resolution.
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 04:53
- mhBf
> In reply to Android Man @ 2014-01-10 20:25 from sXpw - click to readTell me how 2G of RAM or a quad core processor actually affects you in real life. They are such a meaningless numbers. Depending on the apps and the OS, RAM and CPU usage is completely inconsistent. 1 or 3GB of RAM, the normal end user would never feel the difference, unless you're a geek and actually check the system usage.
- Reply
- 2014-01-11 04:05
- ITEi
via apple - Google News http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNFbbrM_w6gyzlyyb4FmNdvzwKq7jg&url=http://www.gsmarena.com/newscomm-7534.php
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment